A recent ruling that not all vans are vans for tax purposes and are actually cars could give thousands of van drivers and their employers higher tax bills, says leading accountants Blick Rothenberg.
In a recent tax case involving Coca Cola, the Upper Tribunal rules that not all āvans (in the common sense use of the word) are vans for tax purposes. Specifically, vans such as the VW Transporter Kombi T5 were held to be a āmulti-purpose vehicleā rather than vans.
Blick Rothernbergās Robert Salter explained: āAny van that is not held to be primarily a vehicle for transport of goods becomes classified as a multi-purpose vehicle (aka a car), and results in a car benefit charge arising for the employee, where there is any āprivate elementā to the vehicleās use.ā
He added this will apply even where private use is insignificant compared to the wider use of the vehicle. For example, occasional commuting in the vehicle.
Salter said: āThe annual taxable benefit charge that accrues for employees in this regard can be substantial, as it is based on the core (list price) of the vehicle when new and the vehicleās CO2 emissions level.
So if a vehicle impacted by this case had an official list price of Ā£25,000 and had a CO2 charge of 25%, which could create an annual benefit-in-kind charge for the employee of Ā£6,250 ā which would create a tax charge for a 20% taxpayer of Ā£1,250.
In additional fuel costs of private motoring could mean a fuel benefit charge based on the car fuel rules rather than the much cheaper van fuel benefit rates.
Salter added: āWhile HMRC have not formally altered their guidance in this area following the UTās ruling, it is probable that the revenue will regard this as a major opportunity to gain additional revenue from āwhite van manā.ā
Employers should also note that they could face an additional NIC (employer only) liability of 13.8% on the value of the car scale and car fuel scale tax benefit charges that arise for their affected employees.
